Search for: "United States v. Cherokee Nation" Results 201 - 220 of 231
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2022, 1:09 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the Jan. 7, Jan. 14, Jan. 21 and Feb. 18 conferences) Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 10:27 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Wood Almost 200 years ago, in the Cherokee Nation cases, Chief Justice John Marshall famously described Indian tribes as “domestic dependent nations. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 8:02 am
" There were roughly 11.5 million vehicles sold in the United States last year, 5.9 million of which were vans, SUVs or pickups. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 8:10 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Background to the Story On October 23, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia determined that NAGPRA does not apply to the requested repatriation of Jim Thorpe’s remains. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 3:08 am by Scott Bomboy
After a decision from the Marshall Court involving the Cherokee Indians and the state of Georgia, Jackson reportedly said, “John Marshal has made his decision. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 1:58 pm by David Kopel
This includes the state’s right-to-carry statute, the Minnesota Citizens’ Personal Protection Act, which is one of the strongest such laws in the United States. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
Application of the Existing Indian Family Doctrine prior to Holyfield     Prior to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 6:41 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Judicial Record Judge Barrett likely participated in a vote on an en banc petition filed by the Village of Hobart in the Oneida Nation v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 7:21 am
The Georgia cerebral palsy resource guide was assembled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit reversed in relevant part, rejecting the states’ nondelegation challenge; the court also concluded other claims were time-barred because the states acted more than a decade after CMS promulgated the rule. [read post]
3 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
That would be fitting, because if this fine book is ultimately about one thing, it surely would be debate itself—the deep and fundamental debate that roiled the early United States and transformed it into a new kind of constitutional republic. [read post]