Search for: "United States v. Christopher Strong" Results 1 - 20 of 209
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2012, 9:18 am by Leland E. Beck
The Supreme Court of the United States declined today to end the judicial practice of deferring to an agency’s interpretation of its own regulations in “friend of the court” briefs filed with a court in Christopher v. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 8:33 pm by Christine Corcos
Eminent German law professors who emigrated to the United States as refugees from Nazi Germany in the 1930s applied Jhering’s ideas to scholarly and judicial developments in the United States. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 8:33 pm
Eminent German law professors who emigrated to the United States as refugees from Nazi Germany in the 1930s applied Jhering’s ideas to scholarly and judicial developments in the United States. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 8:01 am by Sean Quirk
-Taiwan Diplomatic Developments The United States is also increasing its diplomatic engagement with Taiwan. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in… [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
This claim failed in court — most famously in Flood v. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 6:11 am by Chris Wesner
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON In re: GYPC, INC., Debtor Case No. 17‐31030 Adv. [read post]
8 May 2012, 8:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Fernandez Marques, Pfizer Gmbh (Germany) Christopher Hanes, GlaxoSmithKline (United States) Branding clinical trials: benefits in making the physician like the drug/recall it later. [read post]
27 Aug 2022, 11:02 am by Camilla Hrdy
In the course of this work I encountered Section 1905 in the following way.There was, and still is, a federal law on the books enacted in 2007 called the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act that mandates that important information from the majority of significant clinical trials run in the United States be published on the National Institute of Health (NIH) website. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
On the one hand, the discovery sought was limited to narrow issues, the Hague Convention procedures were likely to be more time-consuming, and the United States has a “strong national interest” in providing a remedy for anticompetitive behavior in the international telecommunications market. [read post]