Search for: "United States v. City and County of San Francisco" Results 181 - 200 of 372
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2015, 3:06 am by Amy Howe
” At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Ann McGinley looks back at last week’s oral argument in City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 11:56 am by Chris Winkelman and Philip Gordon
In the dark recesses of single-origin-coffee shops, natural grocery stores, microbreweries and free-range-egg-and-eight-dollar-mimosa brunches in places as far flung as San Francisco, Brooklyn and Washington, D.C., people are coming to a profound, and to them, disturbing revelation: The United States is a republic. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:40 pm by Arthur F. Coon
PG&E owns and operates the Diablo Canyon plant, a two-unit nuclear power plant on 750-acres of land also owned by PG&E near Avila Beach in San Luis Obispo County. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 10:35 am by John Elwood
City and County of San Francisco; and (2) whether, alternatively, federal courts can and should waive Williamson County’s state litigation requirement for prudential reasons when a federal takings claim is factually concrete without state procedures, as some circuit courts hold, or apply the requirement as a rigid jurisdictional barrier, as other circuits hold. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 9:38 am by Eugene Volokh
Ill.) may yield an answer -- unless the housing authority changes its policy, as San Francisco and Warren County (Illinois) had done. [read post]
Regarding exhaustion, the court reasoned that because the County’s hearing notice did not provide any notice of the CEQA grounds it would used to comply with CEQA, as stated in Tomlinson v. [read post]
Regarding exhaustion, the court reasoned that because the County’s hearing notice did not provide any notice of the CEQA grounds it would used to comply with CEQA, as stated in Tomlinson v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:21 am by John Elwood
City and County of San Francisco; and (2) whether, alternatively, federal courts can and should waive Williamson County’s state litigation requirement for prudential reasons when a federal takings claim is factually concrete without state procedures, as some circuit courts hold, or apply the requirement as a rigid jurisdictional barrier, as other circuits hold. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 3:55 pm by Amy Howe
City and County of San Francisco, the justices agreed to decide whether a group of states, led by Arizona, can defend a contentious Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule after the Biden administration declined to do so. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:46 pm by Mark Walsh
City and County of San Francisco, which held that a state court’s resolution of a claim for just compensation under state law will generally preclude any federal suit. [read post]