Search for: "United States v. City and County of San Francisco"
Results 81 - 100
of 372
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2021, 6:00 am
United States .v Schultz, 333 F.3d 393 (2nd Cir. 2003); United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 6:00 am
United States .v Schultz, 333 F.3d 393 (2nd Cir. 2003); United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 5:00 am
, San Francisco Chronicle (Jan. 27, 2020). [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
Petitioners challenged the CEQA exemption determination by Caltrans for an Interstate 5/State Route 56 interchange project in San Diego County as part of its North Coastal Corridor (“NCC”) project to improve vehicle and railroad transportation in the 27-mile La Jolla-Oceanside Corridor. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
Petitioners challenged the CEQA exemption determination by Caltrans for an Interstate 5/State Route 56 interchange project in San Diego County as part of its North Coastal Corridor (“NCC”) project to improve vehicle and railroad transportation in the 27-mile La Jolla-Oceanside Corridor. [read post]
24 Dec 2020, 8:30 am
City and County of San Francisco, California, the Department of Justice seeks review of a decision by the U.S. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
City & Cty. of San Francisco (9th Cir. 2020) 952 F.3d 1157. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 10:22 am
Doe 1 v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
City of San Juan Capistrano, 2020 U.S. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 8:52 pm
City and County of San Francisco, et al. (9th Cir. 2020) ___ F.3d ___. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
County of San Diego (2020) 47 Cal.App.5th 504. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 3:00 am
County of San Diego (2020) 47 Cal.App.5th 504. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 3:00 am
County of San Diego (2020) 47 Cal.App.5th 504. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 2:39 pm
The Court found instructive San Francisco Tomorrow v. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
City of Lafayette, 7Cal.4th 327 (1994), held that the County’s use of the Ruiz pipe did not meet the requirements for inverse condemnation since the County needed to exert minimal control and maintenance over the watercourse near the Ruiz property since the County would be liable for damage caused by streamflow. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 11:12 am
In County of San Mateo et al. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 11:12 am
In County of San Mateo et al. v. [read post]
31 May 2020, 9:56 am
United States v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 12:12 pm
Indeed, in a December 2019 Ninth Circuit ruling, City & Cty. of San Francisco v. [read post]
