Search for: "United States v. City of Chester" Results 21 - 40 of 56
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2012, 7:27 am by Mark M. Campanella, Esq.
Less than a month after hearing oral arguments, the United States Second Circuit Court of Appeals (situated in New York City) has struck down the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) as violative of the U.S. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:03 am by Richard Renner
The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which applies to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment, prohibits the use of excessive force by policemen in the course of an arrest, see, e.g., Graham v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:30 am by Kevin Russell
Village of Port Chester (2007); Goldstein v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Like the United States Supreme Court, there are few cases the Pennsylvania Supreme Court is required to hear; instead, the court decides, at its discretion, which appeals from the intermediate appellate courts it wants to hear. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm by Steven M. Taber
Click Here EPA, DOJ, State of Hawaii, environmental groups, reach agreement with the City and County of Honolulu to address wastewater collection and treatment systems. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm by admin
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 10:55 pm
We find that the district court properly exercised its discretion to impose a sentence without a presentence report under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(c)(1)(A)(ii) and United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 6A1.1(a)(2). [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 6:30 pm
United States Dep't of Agriculture    Department of Agriculture 08a0397p.06 Davie v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 2:19 pm
  The response explained the late filing of the answer by stating that, on the day the answer was due, Respondents' counsel was delayed in returning to his office from a hearing. [read post]
2 Feb 2008, 7:59 am
City of New London, the District Court determined a reasonable juror could not conclude removal of blight and construction of 2,250 new units of affordable housing were mere pretexts. [read post]
2 Feb 2008, 7:59 am
City of New London, the District Court determined a reasonable juror could not conclude removal of blight and construction of 2,250 new units of affordable housing were mere pretexts. [read post]