Search for: "United States v. City of Greenville" Results 1 - 20 of 29
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2016, 12:53 pm by Patrick E. Knie
 Recently, a case was filed in the United States District Court of South Carolina, alleging that a deceased man’s civil rights had been violated after he died on the job. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 12:53 pm by Patrick E. Knie
 Recently, a case was filed in the United States District Court of South Carolina, alleging that a deceased man’s civil rights had been violated after he died on the job. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 3:50 pm by Kent Scheidegger
-Mexico border and banning Muslims from the United States -- or, at the very least, aggressively vetting Muslims seeking entry to the country. [read post]
21 May 2019, 2:48 pm by Sean Gallagher
There are hundreds of thousands of Internet-connected Windows systems in the United States that still appear to be vulnerable to an exploit of Microsoft Windows' Server Message Block version 1 (SMB v. 1) file sharing protocol, despite repeated public warnings to patch systems following the worldwide outbreak of the WannaCry cryptographic malware two years ago. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:00 pm by Ilya Somin
Grenville, the Court emphasized that segregation was compelled by a city ordinance: It cannot be denied that here the City of Greenville, an agency of the State, has provided by its ordinance that the decision as to whether a restaurant facility is to be operated on a desegregated basis is to be reserved to it. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 1:13 pm by Margaret Wood
Question No. 5 Real Case: YES Citation: United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v . [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 2:35 am by Robert A. Epstein
Reading the recently unpublished (not precedential) Appellate Division matter of Connaughton v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 6:00 am by Christopher Tyner
  The trial court did not err by revoking the defendant’s probation where there was substantial evidence that he had constructive possession of controlled substances State v. [read post]
11 Aug 2018, 8:29 pm by RHP
  In any given instance when canine force is used for criminal apprehension, there is the potential for a violation of the individual’s fourth amendment rights as specified in the United States Constitution. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 9:08 am by Gregory Forman
Similar “reform” has followed elsewhere within the United States. [read post]