Search for: "United States v. City of Milwaukee"
Results 1 - 20
of 99
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2018, 2:30 pm
Cities and towns across the United States should do what Milwaukee is now required by the settlement to do — conduct internal and external audits to ensure that stops and frisks are supported by the reasonable suspicion required by the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 7:11 am
Supreme Court denied review in City of Milwaukee Post No. 2874 Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States v. [read post]
8 May 2010, 7:19 pm
A couple of links following up on our recent post about City of Milwaukee Post No. 2874 Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 1:09 pm
In City of Milwaukee Post No. 2874 Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 9:12 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 2:10 pm
Here are the final briefs in City of Milwaukee Post No. 2874 Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 12:36 pm
The United States Supreme Court’s February 20, 2019 decision in Timbs v. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am
Milwaukeeans had to wait until December 12 to learn that the United States Supreme Court had denied the state’s petition for certiorari. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 1:46 pm
Plaintiffs claim that global warming, to which Defendants contribute as the "five largest emitters of carbon dioxide in the United States and . . . among the largest in the world," Connecticut v. [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 1:36 pm
As people in the United States moved from the countryside into cities, their milk supply became increasingly unhealthy. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 6:07 pm
Normet, 405 U.S. 56, 74 (1972), that no fundamental right to housing exists under the United States Constitution. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 11:00 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 6:16 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 6:59 am
BNA's United States Law Week reported in Vol. 75, No. 23 (Dec. 19, 2006) on the case United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 1:17 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
Matchbox in the pocket was not immediately apparent to contain a weapon during a patdown for weapons
1 Jun 2007, 6:37 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
United States through Employment Div. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 8:30 am
Little Rock as just an old solider calling on a friend for help one last time).But never in our history have we seen the disgrace of armed federal officers, US Marshals and others, invading a City in the United States of America against the wishes of the Governor of Oregon, and the Mayor of Portland. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 12:34 pm
Thus, for instance, I find it hard to fault the judges who began to use their enhanced discretion under United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 2:17 pm
City of Milwaukee, 406 U.S. 91, 103 (1972). [read post]
