Search for: "United States v. Clark County, Indiana"
Results 1 - 20
of 32
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2007, 7:48 am
(serving Clark, Floyd & South Eastern Counties) [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 2:21 pm
Clark County Sheriff's Office (Indian Gaming)Tribal Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/tribal/2020.htmlPicard v. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 7:10 pm
NITZ (“Plaintiff”) was a resident of Kent County, State of Michigan. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 5:21 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Willie Clark v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 11:49 am
State of Indiana - "Sweeney did not present any testimony at the post-conviction hearing from which the post-conviction court could make a factual determination as to whether or not Clark County officials or State of Indiana officials were accompanied by a federal official when transporting Sweeney from Kentucky to Indiana. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 8:03 am
Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).Until the appointment of Chief Justice John Roberts in 2005, Minton was the only Hoosier to serve on the Supreme Court of the United States.He is the namesake of the American Inns of Court chapter for Clark and Floyd Counties, Indiana. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 11:40 am
State of Indiana (NFP) David Paul Clark v. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 5:13 pm
Clark v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm
Currently, in the United States around 2,500 police departments have K-9 units and up to 75% of these units train their dogs to bite and hold. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm
Currently, in the United States around 2,500 police departments have K-9 units and up to 75% of these units train their dogs to bite and hold. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm
Currently, in the United States around 2,500 police departments have K-9 units and up to 75% of these units train their dogs to bite and hold. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm
SHARON EUL et al., on behalf of themselves and a class, Plaintiffs,v.TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS et al., Defendants.No. 15 C 7755.United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
It seems to me that the important distinction is that what is in the constitutional canon will be hard to change, and the Roberts Court majority has shown in Shelby County v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
It seems to me that the important distinction is that what is in the constitutional canon will be hard to change, and the Roberts Court majority has shown in Shelby County v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com] No. 07-5439 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States RALPH BAZE, ET AL., Petitioners, v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
23 May 2018, 8:12 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 3:19 pm
The reason that your driver’s license issued by your home state is valid in the rest of the United States is because the states have voluntarily entered into reciprocity agreements to recognize each other’s licenses. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
United States, 16 F. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
Clark v. [read post]
