Search for: "United States v. Clay"
Results 241 - 260
of 303
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2009, 4:29 am
Marcinkowska v. [read post]
22 Aug 2009, 10:21 am
In a case called United States ex rel. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 1:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 1:58 pm
In this case, the hybrid tennis court was not “used” in the United States - it was “used” in Spain and that use was broadcast in the United States.You can watch some of the match here:Decision affirmedMarcinkowska v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Franklin, MA; John Mcdonough, President) Bay State Network, Inc. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 6:37 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 4:35 pm
The Copyright Act provides that "no civil action for infringement of the copyright in any United States work shall be instituted until pre-registration or registration of the copyright claim has been made in accordance with this title. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 1:37 pm
The Copyright Act provides that "no civil action for infringement of the copyright in any United States work shall be instituted until pre-registration or registration of the copyright claim has been made in accordance with this title. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 7:15 pm
As to Judge Clay's discussion of my opinion in Memphis Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 2:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 6:00 am
However the court upheld the dismissal of plaintiff's challenge to the frequency of religious services in his prison unit. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 8:39 am
United States, 77 Fed.Cl. 126, 131 (2007) (action on application is required); La Resolana Architects, PA v. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 7:06 am
In United States ex rel. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 4:25 pm
Clay, 1st Dist. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 7:18 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 8:10 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 10:55 pm
We find that the district court properly exercised its discretion to impose a sentence without a presentence report under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(c)(1)(A)(ii) and United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 6A1.1(a)(2). [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 6:30 pm
United States Dep't of Agriculture Department of Agriculture 08a0397p.06 Davie v. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 4:49 pm
United Techs. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 2:47 pm
Today, the North Carolina Court of Appeals said that it did not have the authority to adopt the "new" standard for consideration of a Rule 12(b)(6) Motion articulated last year by the United States Supreme Court in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
