Search for: "United States v. Clemente"
Results 61 - 80
of 457
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2010, 8:26 pm
"The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 3:12 pm
Section 1985 of United States Code tile 42 provides a civil remedy to citizens who have been deprived of federally guaranteed rights by conspirators acting under "color of law. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 2:48 pm
Here's the audio and transcript for today's oral argument in United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 5:55 pm
The Supreme Court has granted a petition, signed by the Solicitor General and several high-profile lawyers in the US Departments of State, Commerce, and Energy, to review the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's decision United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 3:38 am
" USA v State of Arizona, 9th Cir. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:48 pm
United States to AT&T v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 5:22 pm
City of San Clemente, No. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:18 am
United States (No. 11-182), the state’s appeal of an April 2011 opinion by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that blocked implementation of several key provisions in the law popularly known at “S.B. 1070. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 9:30 pm
Georgia v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 8:59 pm
Clement emphasized that the federal government did not need to enact laws regulating individual conduct to put the treaty into effect in the United States because state laws could do so. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 1:32 pm
United States is here. [read post]
17 Sep 2016, 5:08 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 5:16 pm
Today's decision in Gilliam v. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 6:52 am
Clement filed an amicus brief with the United States Supreme Court siding with non-issuer defendants in a securities class action case. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:00 am
Clement insists that the balancing test in Mathews v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 1:33 pm
House Resolution 676 was framed very broadly: The lawsuit could “seek any appropriate relief regarding the failure” of all executive-branch officials — including the president himself — “to act in a manner consistent with that official’s duties under the Constitution and laws of the United States with respect to implementation” of the ACA. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 12:56 pm
(Paul Clement, arguing for Bond, said that Missouri v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 2:14 pm
See United States’ and Intervenors’ Motion to Hold Case in Abeyance (Doc. 108) at 2, No. 1:11-cv-01303 (D.D.C. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 2:17 pm
This latest stage of the litigation places the constitutional issue front and center.United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 3:20 pm
United States Soccer Federation, Inc. v. [read post]
