Search for: "United States v. Clemons"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2021, 11:30 am
It’s Civics 101 that when taxpayers pay his salary, Clemons’ work is state action. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 4:18 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 5:34 am
United States Dep’t of Commerce. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:24 am
United States, No. 09-6822. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 6:32 am
Clemon (ret.), who not incidentally was the first African-American federal district court judge in the state; Judge Robert Sack of the Second Circuit; and Professors Sonja West (Georgia), Mark Tushnet (Harvard), RonNell Andersen Jones (BYU), David Anderson (Texas), and Christopher Schmidt (Chicago-Kent). [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 3:08 am
United States v. [read post]
24 May 2008, 10:32 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2016, 10:29 am
However, the Sixth Circuit noted that Clemons contradicted with United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 12:00 am
§ 5K2.13; United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 12:35 pm
In Clemons v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 6:09 am
Clemons Politician Can Block Constituents at Twitter–If It’s a “Campaign” Account–Campbell v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 12:55 pm
The United States opposed the judges’ petition for rehearing en banc. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:37 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 8:37 am
The court concludes: Whether it is wise for members of the United States Congress to block critical constituents from their social-media accounts is not for a court to say. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 8:12 am
United States v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:00 am
From a complaint filed last week in San Francisco: Michael M ____ v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 6:36 pm
Rehnquist in Herrera v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 8:07 am
Clemons v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 3:00 am
We did not trust AT&T with this much power in 1913 when it controlled the vital telecommunications industry in the United States. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 8:46 am
Clark; and must be accompanied by “a detailed explanation based on the record,” Clemons v. [read post]
