Search for: "United States v. Clifford" Results 141 - 160 of 182
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Westwood, MA; Debra Nedder, President) Bay State Homes Real Estate Corporation (Woburn, MA; Karen Alderman, President) Bay State Rental Properties, Inc. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Franklin, MA; John Mcdonough, President) Bay State Network, Inc. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 4:17 am
PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, v.SLEDJESKI & TIERNEY, PLLC,;  No 08-CV-5184 (JFB) (ETB);  UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK; 2009 U.S. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:48 am
A lesson for brand owners – Dispute over ILLICIT mark (International Law Office)   Nigeria How not to create a new name: Lessons from NiGaz (Afro-IP)   Poland Trade mark issues on a geographical name of gmina (Class 46)   South Africa Independent Communications Authority of SA publishes position paper on whether there is a need to reform laws relating to copyright ownership in commissioned works (Afro-IP) South African authors seek first public lending right in a… [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 1:02 am
The firm has also recruited a local United Arab Emirates-qualified associate. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 7:44 am by Roshonda Scipio
AUTHOR Tushnet, Mark V., 1945- TITLE The constitution of the United States of America : a contextual analysis / Mark Tushnet. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 1:00 pm
     DISCRIMINATION  Suffolk County has made  international news  as a focal point of racism in the United States. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 3:26 am
Section 861 states that certain `items of gross income shall be treated as income from sources within the United States.... [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 9:40 pm
Clifford and his willingness to create change and look forward to supporting President Elect Obama's efforts to create positive change for the United States at home and around the globe. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 3:25 pm
The issues on appeal are whether (1) the district court erroneously precluded his good faith defense, (2) the second count was multiplicitous, and (3) the district court incorrectly applied the United States Sentencing Guidelines ("Guidelines"). [read post]