Search for: "United States v. Coca"
Results 1 - 20
of 256
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2022, 6:34 am
Coca-Cola does not use the LIMCA mark in the US and its use of THUMS UP in the United States is limited. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:34 am
Coca-Cola does not use the LIMCA mark in the US and its use of THUMS UP in the United States is limited. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 2:33 pm
United States, the Court wrestled with the question of whether convictions for offenses involving coca paste should be subject to the same mandatory minimum sentence as those involving crack. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 9:39 am
Case citation: POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 7:30 am
Coca-Cola has been selling THUMS UP and LIMCA beverages in India for decades, but not in the United States. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 7:46 am
United State District Judge Thomas W. [read post]
17 May 2021, 4:03 am
The Coca-Cola Company v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 5:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 9:30 am
” Eventually, New Coke was renamed “Coke II” and is, according to Coca-Cola Company itself, no longer available in the United States. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 10:27 pm
Thanks to SCOTUSblog for brining to our attention the fact that a brief has been filed with the United States Supreme Court for the upcoming cat's paw case of BCI Coca-Cola Bottling v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 3:43 am
It noted that in Belmora, Bayer acknowledged that it did not use the mark FLANAX in the United States; here Coca-Cola proved that is products are sold by third-party importers in the United States. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 2:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 6:56 am
Procedural History We have been following the critical twists and turns of this litigation which began in 2008 and included a trip to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 6:56 am
Procedural History We have been following the critical twists and turns of this litigation which began in 2008 and included a trip to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 7:46 am
United State District Judge Thomas W. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:21 pm
– United States District Court – Southern District of New York – November 18th, 2015 – This case involves a negligence claim against Coca Cola related to an object allegedly swallowed during the ingestion of a soft drink. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 1:50 pm
In comparison to the Lanham Act, which is predominantly enforced by private suits, the FDCA does not permit private enforcement suits and grants the United States nearly exclusive enforcement authority and pre-empts certain state misbranding laws. [read post]
21 May 2021, 7:31 am
There is a fervent debate in the United States between proponents of gun rights, such as Applicant, and proponents of limitations on those rights. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:00 pm
The Coca-Cola Co., the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) vacated a decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) dismissing Royal Crown’s opposition to the registration of Coca-Cola’s trademarks for soft drinks and sports drinks with the term ZERO. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:29 am
The United States files a brief that technically supports neither party, but in practical effect seems to provide considerable benefit to POM. [read post]
