Search for: "United States v. Columbia Gas & Electric Corporation"
Results 1 - 20
of 42
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2010, 7:44 am
The Clean Energy Act will consolidate BC Hydro and BC Transmission Corporation to provide a single entity that will plan and deliver the clean energy required to meet British Columbia's growing demand for electricity while fostering job creation throughout the province and helping reduce greenhouse gas emissions. [read post]
4 May 2010, 7:44 am
The Clean Energy Act will consolidate BC Hydro and BC Transmission Corporation to provide a single entity that will plan and deliver the clean energy required to meet British Columbia's growing demand for electricity while fostering job creation throughout the province and helping reduce greenhouse gas emissions. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:45 am
Greenhouse Gas Litigation (Jennifer Smokelin, Pittsburgh) Regarding greenhouse gas (GHG) litigation, there are two main areas to watch in 2012: (i) the United States Supreme Court (and the Ninth Circuit) in the aftermath of American Electric Power v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 8:58 am
(6) The term `State’ means each of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and any other territory or possession of the United States. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm
An example of this can be found in Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm
Kelo v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
” (United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 1:55 am
For example, gas delivered to gas stations is already taxed at the importer or distributor level, meaning that no tax has to be administered on the gas station operator or the final consumer purchasing the gas at the pump. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
The United States Department of Agriculture’s California Raisin Marketing Order for raisins requires raisin growers in certain years to give percentage of their crop to the government, free of charge. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 10:21 pm
Mack Trucks: OMB also completed review and EPA released, on August 30, 2012, a version (not very clean) of a final Nonconformance Penalties for On-Highway Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines rule in response to the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Mack Trucks v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm
In doing so, it embraces Supreme Court cases like Tornillo, which involved a state law that compelled newspapers to run partisan editorials, and similar precedents like Pacific Gas & Electric and Hurley. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Scope 2 emissions are those attributable to producing the energy (principally electricity) that the company buys. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 8:15 am
Harris Cooperation Coporate responsibility Corporate responsibility Corporate responsibility corporate rights Corporation for Public Broadcasting Corruption Cost of cost of Cost-benefit calculation Coups Covid 19 Crawford v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 4:02 am
Electric Hendrix, LLC (Seattle Trademark Lawyer [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
App. 2006) (approving jury instruction based on Restatement §908).District of Columbia: Destefano v. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 4:08 pm
(Inventive Step) (Patently-O) CAFC reverses W D Washington on rare interference ruling: Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v Cardiac Science Operating Company (Washington State Patent Law Blog) CAFC: Design patents – symmetry requires elimination of points-of-novelty test for anticipation: International Seaway Trading Corp. v Walgreens Corporation (Patently-O) (IP Osgoode) CAFC: Means plus function claim element does not cover ‘spectrum of undisclosed… [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:35 am
Army of the indigenous tribes in the trans-Mississippi West, the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, the labor injunction, Plessy v. [read post]
