Search for: "United States v. Commanding General"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,204
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2018, 9:34 am
Clearly, the government argued, Butina was in contact with Russian intelligence officials during her time in the United States. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V Extradition shall not be granted in any of the following circumstances: 1. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 7:30 am
United States, the Supreme Court has agreed to take up the question.I find the whole debate very odd. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 6:49 am
That same day, United States Magistrate Judge Gudrun Rice approved the warrant. . . . [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V A. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 2:39 pm
The Recordnet.com reports on the non-capital referral decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V Extradition shall not be granted in any of the following circumstances: 1. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 2:00 am
Kentucky v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 6:07 am
Either side may propose a specific sentence; often the defense will decline to do so, arguing instead in general terms for leniency or simply arguing that the sentence proposed by the prosecution is too high. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 9:57 am
Paragraph 7 is amended as follows: The phrase “United States ground-based ballistic missile defense interceptors” is replaced by the phrase “a United States Ballistic Missile Defense System”. [read post]
8 May 2009, 12:15 am
Perry, that the United States Supreme Court ruled constitutional. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 8:33 pm
United States (1997) (and that lurked behind the decision in Medellin v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 1:00 pm
Ratification advised by the Senate of the United States of America on May 27, 1970. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 7:36 am
The full brief of the United States is available here. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 7:32 am
United States, No. 10-158, has been distributed for the 29 October conference. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 8:40 am
The FSIA generally gives foreign states immunity, but contains an exception for non-commercial torts that take place entirely within the United States (such as traffic accidents caused by foreign diplomats). [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
This defense comes from a United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit case (also, confusingly enough, named City of New York v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 12:08 pm
” Findley’s belief that the second sentence made state-owned submerged lands “not a portion of the park,” prompted Alito to remark that “whether something can be within a unit but not be a portion of the unit is kind of a nice question. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 4:52 pm
Before us in the present is a 49-page document docketed as 23-cr-80101 in the Southern District of Florida, conspicuously captioned: United States of America v. [read post]
