Search for: "United States v. Computer Sciences Corp."
Results 1 - 20
of 150
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2023, 4:33 pm
The year of Paradox’s debut, 1978, arrived “during a peak era of antitrust enforcement”.[6] But by 2004, Professor Bork’s panegyric to maximizing “consumer welfare” had led the United States Supreme Court to pronounce “charging monopoly prices” not only not a crime but an “important element of the free-market system”.[7]Indeed, Bork’s valorization of a narrowly economic measure of… [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
To be sure, there are gaps, inconsistencies, and mistakes, but the statistics chapter should be a must-read for federal (and state) judges. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:30 am
The summer of our discontents Two months ago, if you prompted Version 3 of the AI-art generator MidJourney to generate depictions of an “otter on a plane using wifi,” you were rewarded with the nonsense in the left panel of our lead graphic. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Compare In re NVIDIA Corp. [read post]
5 Mar 2022, 9:27 pm
”) Normally does not mean always.[1] See Normally, Cambridge Dictionary (2019), https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dict ionary/english/normally (defining “normally” as “usually or regularly” and “usually, or in most cases” (emphasis added)); see also United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm
The rest of the United States has two types of policies. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 4:46 am
CLS Bank decision of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 4:07 pm
United States Forbes had a piece “Judge Tosses Out Another GOP Lawsuit Against CNN”. [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 5:46 pm
United States USA today had a piece “Rudy Giuliani’s ‘Borat 2’ scene: What can he do about it legally? [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 2:02 pm
Co. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 7:14 am
There are no state-level copyright laws, meaning that any legal dispute regarding a copyright is subject to the same federal governing laws, regardless of where the two parties settle the dispute or where the dispute originated. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 2:18 pm
July 29, 2019: Capital One issues a public announcement concerning the data breach, which affected approximately 100 million individuals in the United States and approximately 6 million in Canada. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm
Forbes had a piece on misinformation and how roughly one third of social media users across the United States, as well as Argentina, Germany, South Korea, Spain and United Kingdom, reported seeing false or misleading information about coronavirus. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 1:37 pm
See, e.g., Credit Acceptance Corp. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 12:42 pm
Wednesday, February 5, 2020, at 2:30 p.m.: The House Armed Services Subcommittee on Seapower and Projection Forces and the Subcommittee on Readiness will hold a joint hearing on Navy and Marine Corps readiness in the Pacific. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 12:05 pm
Marine Corps. [read post]
5 May 2019, 9:15 am
On June 19, it will be five years since the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in Alice Corp. v. [read post]
5 May 2019, 9:15 am
On June 19, it will be five years since the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in Alice Corp. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 2:26 am
There is no split between the circuits on this issue, as is evident in the cases presented by Google (Lotus Development Corp. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 1:59 pm
Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. and its 2014 decision in Alice Corp. v. [read post]
