Search for: "United States v. Congress Construction Co." Results 61 - 80 of 779
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2022, 1:15 pm by Unknown
Big Man (Tribal Courts; Tribal Codes; Subject Matter Jurisdiction) Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2022.html United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by John C. Coffee, Jr.
”[11] So stated, this approach simply announced a rule of statutory construction that did not seem particularly frightening. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 12:28 am by Bill Henderson
  Note that I write this post during the public hearings for the January 6th Commission, which is faithfully documenting an attempted coup of the United States government that would not have been possible without a rampant populist fervor that continues to this day. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
25 May 2022, 5:16 pm by Thomas James
In the United States, copyright in a screen display can be claimed in connection with the registration of a copyright claim in the software program. [read post]
25 May 2022, 5:16 pm by Thomas James
In the United States, copyright in a screen display can be claimed in connection with the registration of a copyright claim in the software program. [read post]
12 May 2022, 7:21 am by Philip Zelikow
Here is how, legally, the United States and allied governments might implement the approach I advocated with Johnson. [read post]
9 May 2022, 8:51 am by William C. MacLeod
[The 14th entry in our FTC UMC Rulemaking symposium is a guest post from Bill MacLeod, a former Federal Trade Commission bureau director and currently a partner with Kelley Drye & Warren LLP, where he chairs the firm’s antitrust practice and co-chairs its consumer protection practice. [read post]
4 May 2022, 5:01 am by Albert W. Alschuler
  If induced to comply with the House’s subpoenas, Bannon, Meadows, Navarro and Scavino—like their possible co-conspirators John Eastman, Michael Flynn, Jeffrey Clark, Roger Stone and Alex Jones—might invoke the privilege against self-incrimination. [read post]