Search for: "United States v. Connelly"
Results 1 - 20
of 51
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2024, 3:04 am
Susan V. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 9:27 pm
At issue legally is Title 17 of the United States Code. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:47 am
Connelly v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:17 am
United States – Whether federal bribery laws make it a crime to accept “gratuities” – that is, payment for something a government official has already done, without any prior agreement to take those actions in exchange for payment Connelly v. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 9:30 pm
United States, Sarah Friedman on Hansberry v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
United States. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
Again, as the court ruled in Hazelton v Connelly,13 all that is required for a resignation to become operative is its delivery to the appointing authority prior to the appointing authority's receipt of an employee’s request to withdraw or rescind the resignation. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
Again, as the court ruled in Hazelton v Connelly,13 all that is required for a resignation to become operative is its delivery to the appointing authority prior to the appointing authority's receipt of an employee’s request to withdraw or rescind the resignation. [read post]
16 May 2022, 12:19 pm
Finally, it barred Chinese immigrants from becoming citizens, though the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 5:00 am
” United States, 1882. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
For example, if, in a layoff situation, the clerk having greater seniority than a co-worker employed as a clerk in the same layoff unit is excessed, the typical redress awarded to the individual incorrectly laid off is reinstatement to his or her former position with full back salary and benefits. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
For example, if, in a layoff situation, the clerk having greater seniority than a co-worker employed as a clerk in the same layoff unit is excessed, the typical redress awarded to the individual incorrectly laid off is reinstatement to his or her former position with full back salary and benefits. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Again, as the court ruled in Hazelton v Connelly,[13] all that is required for a resignation to become operative is its delivery to the appointing authority prior to the appointing authority's receipt of an employee’s request to withdraw or rescind the resignation. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Again, as the court ruled in Hazelton v Connelly,[13] all that is required for a resignation to become operative is its delivery to the appointing authority prior to the appointing authority's receipt of an employee’s request to withdraw or rescind the resignation. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Again, as the court ruled in Hazelton v Connelly,[13] all that is required for a resignation to become operative is its delivery to the appointing authority prior to the appointing authority's receipt of an employee’s request to withdraw or rescind the resignation. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Again, as the court ruled in Hazelton v Connelly,[13] all that is required for a resignation to become operative is its delivery to the appointing authority prior to the appointing authority's receipt of an employee’s request to withdraw or rescind the resignation. [read post]
4 Apr 2020, 6:44 am
Such forum selection provisions were broadly implemented in the wake of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 8:36 am
Last month, the military commission for the matter of United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 8:27 pm
In 1986, the United States Supreme Court ruled that a Fifth Amendment or Miranda violation does not take place without police coercion, but left it up to the states whether to grant Fifth Amendment relief even without coercion. [read post]
