Search for: "United States v. Connelly"
Results 21 - 40
of 51
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2008, 9:00 pm
Except for some enlightened counties in Nevada, prostitution remains criminalized in the United States. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:38 pm
The requirement of authentication is thus a condition precedent to admitting evidence” (United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 3:44 pm
United States: A Minnow or a Shark? [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 3:55 am
Supreme Court makes it clear that absent "exceptional circumstances," the Thirteenth Amendment bars compulsory labor “enforced by the use or threatened use of physical or legal coercion," citing United States v Kozminski 487 US 931 and a number of other cases. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am
United States, holding that the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:17 am
United States – Whether federal bribery laws make it a crime to accept “gratuities” – that is, payment for something a government official has already done, without any prior agreement to take those actions in exchange for payment Connelly v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 6:22 am
Connelly, 479 U.S. 157, 169 (1986). [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
For example, if, in a layoff situation, the clerk having greater seniority than a co-worker employed as a clerk in the same layoff unit is excessed, the typical redress awarded to the individual incorrectly laid off is reinstatement to his or her former position with full back salary and benefits. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
For example, if, in a layoff situation, the clerk having greater seniority than a co-worker employed as a clerk in the same layoff unit is excessed, the typical redress awarded to the individual incorrectly laid off is reinstatement to his or her former position with full back salary and benefits. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 11:52 am
Connelly, Mem–10–102 (Aug. 12, 2 [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 12:42 pm
Medical expenses can be deducted in the inheritance tax.Under United States Supreme Court Case, Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc., v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 7:42 am
Clark v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 1:06 pm
Following decisions in such cases as Connelly v RTZ, Lubbe v Cape and Ngcobo v Thor Chemicals, the present case contributes to the development of the law relating to the jurisdiction of English co [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:45 am
United States PRC President Xi Jinping has agreed to discuss the South China Sea with President Obama next week on the sidelines of the fourth Nuclear Security Summit. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 12:36 am
PR (Sri Lanka) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Rev 2) [2011] EWCA Civ 988 (11 August 2011): Court of Appeal considers application of “some other compelling reason” test for 3rd bite of cherry immigration appeals Connelly, Re Judicial Review [2011] NIQB 62 (5 August 2011): Northern Ireland High Court rejects UK court’s decision in Hookway (96 hour detention on bail case), says court “failed to recognise the context… [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
Again, as the court ruled in Hazelton v Connelly,13 all that is required for a resignation to become operative is its delivery to the appointing authority prior to the appointing authority's receipt of an employee’s request to withdraw or rescind the resignation. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
Again, as the court ruled in Hazelton v Connelly,13 all that is required for a resignation to become operative is its delivery to the appointing authority prior to the appointing authority's receipt of an employee’s request to withdraw or rescind the resignation. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Again, as the court ruled in Hazelton v Connelly,[13] all that is required for a resignation to become operative is its delivery to the appointing authority prior to the appointing authority's receipt of an employee’s request to withdraw or rescind the resignation. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Again, as the court ruled in Hazelton v Connelly,[13] all that is required for a resignation to become operative is its delivery to the appointing authority prior to the appointing authority's receipt of an employee’s request to withdraw or rescind the resignation. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Again, as the court ruled in Hazelton v Connelly,[13] all that is required for a resignation to become operative is its delivery to the appointing authority prior to the appointing authority's receipt of an employee’s request to withdraw or rescind the resignation. [read post]
