Search for: "United States v. Cotter" Results 1 - 20 of 86
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2010, 9:40 am by Lawrence Solum
Three years later, as we await the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Bilski v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 10:56 am by OxFirst
Pierce, United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 4:00 am by Canadian Association of Law Libraries
Reviewed by Catherine Cotter Head Law Librarian Gerard V La Forest Law Library, University of New Brunswick In CLLR 43:2 One Law for All? [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:52 am by Melanie Fontes
As the Supreme Court made clear in Nixon v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:05 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Thus, the measure was nearly identical to the ban in federal law that was struck down by the Supreme Court in January of last year in the case of Citizens United v. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 7:25 am by Jason Rantanen
” From the Introduction:  On August 11, 2020, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit handed down its opinion in one of the most closely-watched, and potentially consequential, antitrust decisions in recent years, Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
5 Sep 2006, 4:02 pm
Genentech; CAFC Decision in MedImmune v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 1:13 pm by kwalters
The position is created pursuant to the state constitution, currently at Article V, Section 1 of the 1970 Illinois Constitution. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
United States Postal Service, in which the court held that the government is not a “person” who can challenge the validity of a patent under the America Invents Act, for this blog. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 7:18 am by Kalvis Golde
United States Postal Service this year, which secured her place “near the top of what is still a fairly short list of female Supreme Court advocates in private practice. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 3:43 am by Edith Roberts
United States and Thole v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 12:30 pm by kmckay
(v) conducting, on the agency’s behalf, collective bargaining negotiations under chapter 71 of title 5, United States Code. [read post]