Search for: "United States v. County of Clark" Results 121 - 140 of 400
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2016, 5:38 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
Scalia's majority opinion was very useful in the ultimate habeas corpus petition filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.Another example of Scalia's handiwork in the realm of the constitutional rights of the accused is his dissent in the 2000 case of Apprendi v New Jersey, which ripened into a majority opinion 4-years later in Blakely v Washington, holding that a judge cannot fashion a sentence based on facts that… [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 3:12 pm
Additionally, the court held that the fact that the child brought more personal belongings with her than usual, in anticipation that she would remain in the United States was evidence of a settled purpose to reside in the United States. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 5:03 pm
United Jersey Bank, 189 N.J. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 1:30 am
A-23-882774-B, Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County, Nevada. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 1:25 am
Williams KINGS COUNTY Landlord/Tenant Law Hearing Officer's Final Decision Found Valid, Rational; Tenant Bound by Stipulation to Vacate Clark v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 6:03 am by Allison Trzop
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 7:09 am by PaulKostro
United States Steel Corp., 15 N.J. 301, 311 (1954)]. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 4:38 am
(g) there is any other basis consistent with the constitutions of this State and the United States for the exercise of personal jurisdiction. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 11:22 am by Josh Fensterbush
The two case patients had attended the festival on O…Read More » Outbreak of E. coli O157 Linked to Cleveland County (NC) Fair, 2012 Organism: E. coli O157 Vehicle: unknown In October 2012 North Carolina state health officials investigated an outbreak of E. coli O157 among persons who attended the Cleveland County Fair. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 1:55 pm by Aaron Pelley
Durbin’s commitment as a sexually violent predator, disagreeing with his contentions that (1) the State had no authority under former RCW 71.09.030 (2008) to file an SVP petition against him in Clark County because he had no Washington convictions for sexually violent crimes; (2) the current version of RCW 71.09.030, Laws of 2009, ch. 409, § 3, cannot be applied retroactively to justify filing the State’s petition in Clark… [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council 31 (AFSCME)[6] and National Institute of Family & Life Advocates (NIFLA) v. [read post]