Search for: "United States v. Cover"
Results 61 - 80
of 14,048
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2019, 3:49 pm
In United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 5:32 am
CAAF heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 6:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:52 am
The team reports that “When the United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 6:36 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:15 am
United States. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:15 am
United States. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 1:23 pm
” Nash, slip op. at 13 (citing United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:45 pm
If the presidency is an "office *** under the United States" that covers Donald Trump under Section 3, of the Fourteenth Amendment, then it has to also be an "Office under the United States" for the purposes of the Incompatibility Clause, which bars Members of Congress from holding any "Office under the United States. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 7:24 am
United States held that the “residual clause” of the Armed Career Criminal Act is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 11:52 am
United States Supreme Court Blocks Vaccine or Test Rule Over the past few weeks, the Omicron variant of COVID-19 variant has exploded. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 3:59 am
State government policy makers not covered by Age Discrimination in Employment Act [ADEA]Source: Findlaw.Com Weekly Labor & Employment Law Newsletter, December 27-31, 2010Opp v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-421 Filed: December 27, 2018 ALICE KIMBLE, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 1:33 pm
On December 6, 2010, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in what will eventually be known as Wal-Mart v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 12:37 pm
In Lawson v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
The committee has included an understanding in the resolution of advice and consent that addresses this point (see section V below). [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
Article V(1) states that extradition shall not be granted for political offenses. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 7:50 am
This term, the United States Supreme Court will hear arguments in the case of Gould v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 9:00 am
Inclusion of a dual-criminality clause without a list of offenses covered by the Treaty obviates the need to renegotiate or supplement the Treaty as offenses become punishable under the laws of both parties. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 8:46 am
The United States, pursuant to the Federal Government’s constitutionally enumerated power to make treaties, ratified the treaty in 1997. [read post]
