Search for: "United States v. Covington"
Results 81 - 100
of 178
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2017, 4:29 am
Covington, “was clear: injunctions are governed by equitable principles, in voting rights law just as elsewhere,” and that a footnote in another opinion, in Kokesh v. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 10:36 am
United States, 16-7806. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 4:26 am
United States, the justices ruled 8-0 that co-conspirators who do not benefit personally from illegal proceeds cannot be ordered to forfeit property. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:57 am
United States, which asks whether the government must obtain a warrant for historical records showing where a cell phone connects with towers. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 6:36 am
Covington, 16-649, and – wait, we already did this one – North Carolina v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:32 am
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit’s reasoning in United States v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 2:22 pm
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit’s reasoning in United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 12:30 pm
Covington, 16-1023. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 7:58 am
A recent case, Deschamps v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 12:17 pm
The company just updated its terms of service and the following clause is the first thing you see - in bold: Terms of Service IF YOU RESIDE IN THE UNITED STATES, PLEASE NOTE: SECTION 34 OF THESE TERMS OF SERVICE CONTAINS AN ARBITRATION CLAUSE AND CLASS ACTION WAIVER. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 1:33 pm
House Resolution 676 was framed very broadly: The lawsuit could “seek any appropriate relief regarding the failure” of all executive-branch officials — including the president himself — “to act in a manner consistent with that official’s duties under the Constitution and laws of the United States with respect to implementation” of the ACA. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 8:20 am
The case, RILR v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 7:44 am
The case, RILR v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
”Id. at 1141-42 (various citations omitted).Courts in other states following this general approach are: Haygood v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:32 pm
– McLean, VA lawyer Mark Dombroff of McKenna Long & Aldridge on the firm’s blog, Plane-ly Spoken Supreme Court rules induced infringement requires a 271(a) direct infringer (Limelight v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 11:35 am
Fla. 2014)(Covington, J.)United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 7:14 am
This Covington E-Alert provides a detailed look at the parties' arguments and the court's holdings in order to assess what the decision means for businesses going forward. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 7:44 am
The Supreme Court majority in McCutcheon v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 9:25 am
An appellate court recently denied an appeal by a defendant in a white collar criminal case, following his conviction on charges of mail fraud, conspiracy to commit mail fraud, theft from an organization receiving federal funds, and conspiracy to commit money laundering. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 9:36 am
A privilege for everyone would mean a privilege for no one, because Congress would never pass an act that allows every single citizen in the United States to quash a subpoena. [read post]
