Search for: "United States v. Covington"
Results 101 - 120
of 178
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2013, 7:28 am
Haycock requested reimbursement for the transportation costs, including airfare, hotel costs and travel expenses of Haycock and S.C.E Federal courts typically award successful ICARA petitioners "airfare incurred in traveling to and from the United States to appear in court." [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 4:30 am
We cannot help but mention that now the "science" behind Accutane IBD claims has been held to be inadequate in both United States federal courts and Canada, leaving one judge in New Jersey as the outlier. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 5:57 pm
Covington) [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 12:15 am
Weinstein in United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 5:55 am
Further, the United States Supreme Court recently heard arguments in Vance v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 3:17 pm
United States of America v. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 9:13 pm
In a high profile disqualification dispute, Covington & Burling was disqualified in the case of State of Minnesota v. 3M. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 1:37 am
Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 2:46 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California dismissed all eight claims in Low v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 2:46 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California dismissed all eight claims in Low v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 11:47 am
Reproduced with permission from Electronic Commerce & Law Report, (June 13, 2012). [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 9:07 pm
In United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 9:06 pm
., of the Washington office of Covington & Burling, will argue first, with 40 minutes of time. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 2:00 am
The Supreme Court decision, Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 4:35 pm
We touched on it a bit yesterday, but today's roundup is quite heavy on United States v. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am
Milwaukeeans had to wait until December 12 to learn that the United States Supreme Court had denied the state’s petition for certiorari. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 10:19 am
Rogers, the United States Supreme Court held that the 14th Amendment does not categorically require the state to provide counsel for all indigent parents facing a civil contempt hearing for non-payment of child support where the other parent is also not represented by counsel. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 4:46 pm
The court affirmed, but on the alternative ground that plaintiff had not shown that the Covington report was essential to his stated purpose, which was to investigate possible corporate wrongdoing. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 12:46 pm
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit in Liberty University v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 5:50 am
United States. [read post]
