Search for: "United States v. Cox"
Results 61 - 80
of 553
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2021, 10:54 am
Both of these issues were addressed by Washington State Supreme Court in Putman v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am
& Health Servs. v. [read post]
3 May 2021, 9:08 pm
Last month, with state bills targeting transgender youth sweeping the United States, Arkansas became the first state in the country to ban gender-affirming medical care for transgender youth. [read post]
1 May 2021, 5:16 pm
United States, which held that the federal government may not order state and local officials to enforce federal laws. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 7:48 am
District Court for the District of Columbia in P.J.E.S. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 1:38 pm
Cox and Rodríguez contend that Trump v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
In his remarks on the amendment, Hutchinson indicated that it was designed to address “the growing threat that the People’s Republic of China poses to the citizens of the United States. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 2:39 pm
United States (Sacred Sites; Oak Flat/Chi-chil Bildagoteel) Allegany Capital Enteprises, LLC v. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 5:01 am
But in about a dozen states, the laws remain on the books. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 7:56 am
The Ninth Circuit emphatically rejected the state action argument in PragerU v. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 6:09 pm
In Borealis Power Holdings Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
" See, e.g., State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 1:01 pm
Thousands of people have been vaccinated for the coronavirus in the United Kingdom, reports BBC News. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 2:40 pm
As the Supreme Court recognized in the Reno v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 6:30 am
It was not until 2017—more than two decades after United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 6:30 am
United States (2012), presidential administrations have used litigation to curtail the excesses of enforcement-minded state policies. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 11:41 am
Amy Coney Barrett’s Judicial Philosophy Doesn’t Hold Up to Scrutiny By Angus King Jr., United States Senator, Maine and Heather Cox Richardson, Professor of History, Boston College Angus King Jr. and Heather Cox Richardson argue against originalism—the method of legal interpretation that favors interpreting the Constitution or laws based strictly on their original meaning—and for an interpretative philosophy that looks to the ideals and… [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 4:39 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 2:09 pm
(citing United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 9:08 am
Cox's lawyer. [read post]
