Search for: "United States v. Coxe" Results 221 - 240 of 555
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2009, 9:07 pm
Today was the deadline for all amici supporting Harris Associates to file their briefs in the Supreme Court case of Jones v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
If the United States walks away, it will put Ukraineat risk. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 1:50 am by Rosalind English
 Thus, in Cox v Turkey  (20 May 2010), the Strasbourg Court held that Article 10 was engaged by the ban on the re-entry of a US woman who had expressed strong views on issues of Kurdish assimilation and the treatment of Armenians. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 2:57 am by Laura Sandwell
Cox v Ergo Versicherung AG (formerly known as Victoria), heard 20 – 21 January 2014. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 4:53 am by David Post
Her customers are mostly in the United States and Canada. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 4:53 am by David Post
Her customers are mostly in the United States and Canada. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 11:41 am by NCC Staff
Amy Coney Barrett’s Judicial Philosophy Doesn’t Hold Up to Scrutiny By Angus King Jr., United States Senator, Maine and Heather Cox Richardson, Professor of History, Boston College Angus King Jr. and Heather Cox Richardson argue against originalism—the method of legal interpretation that favors interpreting the Constitution or laws based strictly on their original meaning—and for an interpretative philosophy that looks to the ideals and… [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:30 am
”Oregon is one of only five states that still offers a veteran home loan program. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 5:34 am
Cox, 343 N.W.2d 641, 643 (Minnesota Supreme Court 1984).State v. [read post]
13 Nov 2016, 6:13 am by Brooke
Meigs, Lincoln’s General, Master Builder of the Union Army is also reviewed in the newspaper.Nicholas Syrett's American Child Bride: A History of Minors and Marriage in the United States is reviewed at Slate. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 10:54 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Both of these issues were addressed by Washington State Supreme Court in Putman v. [read post]