Search for: "United States v. Coyle" Results 21 - 40 of 220
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2022, 4:42 am by Jonathan H. Adler
United States, in which the Court held that the Double Jeopardy Clause does not bar successive prosecutions of distinct offenses arising from a single act, even if a single sovereign prosecutes them. [read post]
18 May 2010, 6:14 am
United States Supreme Court Decision: May 17, 2010 In a 5-4 opinion by Justice Kennedy, the United States Supreme Court ruled that sentencing juveniles to life without the possibility of parole for non-homicide cases is impermissible under the Eighth Amendment’s cruel and unusual punishment clause. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 11:34 am by Andrew Hamm
United States and United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:52 am by Matt Sundquist
Humanitarian Law Project and United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 4:34 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks when erroneous applications of the U.S. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 8:13 am
In 2004, the International Court of Justice ruled in a case involving 52 Mexican nationals on death row in the United States that U.S. authorities had violated the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations by failing to inform the Mexicans of their right to consult their consuls when arrested. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 7:21 am
United States and Weyhrauch v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 7:50 am by Jay Willis
Florida, United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 3:05 am by Renee Newman Knake
The Supreme Court hears argument today in Milavetz, Gallop & Milavetz, P.A. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 5:17 am by Amy Howe
United States from a linguistic perspective, arguing that the case “presents about as stark a clash between opposing canons as you could ever hope to find. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 3:10 pm by Mitu Gulati
Andrew’s guest was John Coyle, contracts/choice-of-law guru. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 7:10 am by Amy Howe
United States ex rel. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 7:47 am
The United States had agreed to comply with the ICJ as its obligation under an international treaty. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 3:31 am by Edith Roberts
” At Slate (via How Appealing), Lorelai Laird writes that United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 2:21 pm by Jack Sharman
Portions bear quoting at some length: The criminal justice system in the United States today bears little relationship to what the Founding Fathers contemplated, what the movies and television portray, or what the average American believes. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether the residual clause of the career-offender sentencing guideline is unconstitutionally vague, and Jennings v. [read post]