Search for: "United States v. Craig Miller"
Results 1 - 20
of 67
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2022, 9:20 am
Facts: This case (Wood v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether something is… [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 7:21 am
State v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 1:45 pm
Miller. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Georgia United States v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 9:44 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
The constitutional importance of this point is clear: in R (on the application of Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, which was cited by Lord Pannick on behalf of Gina Miller during his oral submissions, Lord Hoffmann held that ‘the unique authority Parliament derives from its representative character’. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 10:29 am
Kean Miller submitted an amicus brief in Craig Steve Arabie v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 12:48 pm
”); United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 5:01 am
As I’ve written previously on Lawfare, in that case: The court analyzed the law under the framework of intermediate scrutiny established under Craig v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:40 pm
”); United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 2:42 pm
There are two new defendants charged in the scheme, Craig Miller and Derrick Taylor. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 11:06 pm
From Japan to the United States and beyond, karaoke is wildly popular. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 7:05 pm
Consider the facts: On April 1, 2006, Officers Craig Miller, David Rivera and Charles Gargano of the New Haven police department were patrolling the Fair Haven neighborhood as part of their duties with that city’s drug interdiction unit. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 4:36 am
Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Moreover, in his opinion, these types of lawsuit violated rights guaranteed by the United States and North Carolina constitutions. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 9:53 am
A few years after deciding Pennsylvania Coal, the Supreme Court returned to regulatory takings with Miller v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 2:32 pm
Ginsburg ponders the issue at hand (Art Lien) Ginsburg gets a laugh when she asks Rikelman a friendly question about Craig v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 5:45 pm
Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 11:23 am
Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture. [read post]
