Search for: "United States v. Cross"
Results 141 - 160
of 7,366
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2011, 11:16 am
See United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 4:21 am
A case involving the fatal shooting of a Mexican national by a United States Border Patrol Agent is back at the Supreme Court a second time as the Justices heard arguments this week in Hernandez v. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 5:27 am
Here are the relevant materials in United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 8:30 am
United States Organizations for Bankruptcy Alternatives v. [read post]
13 Jan 2007, 4:54 pm
Soledad Veterans War Memorial to the United States. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:10 am
Nor could he force Friends of the Cross to return the funds to the state. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 6:21 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 7:10 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 6:28 am
United States (W.D. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 6:05 am
The recent opinion of the Sixth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 5:46 am
In United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 5:42 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 4:19 pm
See United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 1:59 pm
(Orin Kerr) If anything is clear from the Supreme Court’s decision last week in United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 12:49 am
Tenth Circuit concludes, in fraud case involving the sale of aircraft parts, cross-examination of character witnesses did not include impermissible guilt-assuming hypothetical questions based on the charges, but any error was harmless based on overwhelming evidence of guilt, in United States v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 8:49 am
See e.g., United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 9:51 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 3:42 am
The United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, Judge Eginton, has ruled in the case of E.K. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 11:12 am
§ 3742 confer authority to correct a legal error absent a cross-appeal, particularly for "sentencing errors that the Government refrained from pursuing," and noted that the strict time limits on notices of appeal and cross-appeal would be undermined if an appeals court could modify the judgment in favor of a party who had filed no notice of appeal. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 10:45 am
The 6th and 14th Amendments of the United State Constitution guarantee an accused party the right to “be confronted with the witnesses against him. [read post]