Search for: "United States v. Cruz" Results 221 - 240 of 496
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2015, 3:13 am by David Cruz
  This suggests that Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito – all of whom voted to uphold the discriminatory Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 6:52 am by James Bickford
The Santa Cruz Sentinel reports on Astra USA, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:11 am by Justin Cole
” Brief that makes this argument: The United States, filed in support of vacatur. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 5:19 pm by Alex Ely
Yesterday, the Senate Judiciary Committee began the first of two day-long hearings on the nomination of Loretta Lynch to be the next Attorney General of the United States. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 9:13 am
Harvie Wilkinson, III, of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 10:51 am by Lovechilde
, who calls for us to "declare war and harness all of the power that the United States can bring to bear, both diplomatic and military of course, to be able to take out ISIS. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Andrew Pincus, amicus for the Chamber of Commerce of the United States, finished up Respondent’s argument by first addressing Justice Liu’s question regarding a modified Gentry rule. [read post]
24 May 2012, 5:41 am by Administrator
May 24, 2010 – The United States Supreme Court decides Hardt v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 9:41 am by Beth Graham
” Later, the Court of Appeal reversed and remanded the case for arbitration of all of McGill’s claims based on the United States Supreme Court’s 2011 decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 9:09 am by Phil
Inducement to Infringe - In light of the Supreme Court of the United States' decision in Global-Tech v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 5:13 am by Eugene Volokh
Cruz Corchado, 119 D.P.R. 8 (1987).III.As a threshold question, the majority of this Special Panel recognizes the compelling State interest in protecting the physical security of the citizens that inhabit Puerto Rico. [read post]