Search for: "United States v. D. D. B." Results 1 - 20 of 6,636
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2017, 3:26 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
The recent opinion of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada in Caballero v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 5:15 am by Peter Reap
C&D Zodiac, Inc, United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, No. 2016-1496, 03 October 2017 appeared first on Kluwer Patent Blog. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 7:23 am by Tracy Thomas
Anthony, Federal Judicial Center (2005) United States v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 6:23 am
So holds the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in Trustees, Mason Tenders District Council Welfare Fund v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:47 am by DMLP Staff
Attorney)Source of Law: United StatesVerdict or Settlement Amount: N/ALegal Claims: Computer Fraud and Abuse ActFraudTheftOtherCourt Name: United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas: Dallas DivisionLegal Counsel: Douglas A Morris (Federal Public Defender - Dallas); Ahmed Ghappour (University of Texas Law School), Charles D. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 2:50 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Court of Federal Claims (CFC) is to provide a judicial forum for most non-tort requests for significant monetary relief against the United States; (b) contradict Nevada v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 7:29 am by Immigration Prof
Forrest in a petition for habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:56 am by sally
R (Tilianu) v Social Fund Inspector and another [2010] EWHC 213 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 54 “Although art 7(3)(b)-(d) of Council Directive 2004/38/EC of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the member states (OJ 2004 L158, p 77), applied to formerly employed workers, it did not apply to those who had been self employed. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 4:00 am by Michael Woods and Gordon LaFortune
The United States has taken the next step in its trade dispute with Canada and asked for the establishment of a panel to examine its complaint regarding Canada’s administration of its tariff-rate quotas (TRQ) allocations for 14 dairy products.[1] In its request, the United States Trade Representative (USTR) [2] claims that Canada’s allocation of import quotas exclusively to “producers” violates the terms of Canada’s commitments in the… [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:47 am by DMLP Staff
§ 875(c); conspiracy to make publically available restricted personal information of an employee of the United States under 18 U.S.C. [read post]