Search for: "United States v. D. D. B." Results 21 - 40 of 6,636
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2014, 11:47 am by DMLP Staff
§ 875(c); conspiracy to make publically available restricted personal information of an employee of the United States under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 4:10 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: 2013-08-26 Defendant State_s Motion to Amend Answer and Counterclaim (3) Affirmation in Support of State Defendant_s Motion to Amend Answer and Counterclaim (2) Exhibit A – Amended Answer and Counterclaim (3) Exhibit B – letters from Banks (3) Exhibit C – 2012-05-24 Statement by Counsel (3) Exhibit D 2013-07-11 Chief_s Correspondence to FERC (2) US intervention materials here. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Plaintiff Excelencia Importing Pty Ltd. d/b/a Kennels & Kats (“K&K”) brought forth a complaint against Defendant Jinping Leng d/b/a Delomo (“Defendant”). [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 7:00 am by Alex Nealon
Mary Mkhitaryan d/b/a Angry Birdz Chicken United States District Court for the Central District of California Case Number […] [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 7:00 am by Alex Nealon
Mary Mkhitaryan d/b/a Angry Birdz Chicken United States District Court for the Central District of California Case Number […] [read post]
8 May 2019, 4:57 am by Cody Bassham
., a Maryland Corp. d/b/a Sunoco Food Mart, Plaintiffs – Appellants, v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 3:23 am
Because opposer failed to allege use of her mark SULBING in the United States, the Board dismissed her claim of likelihood of confusion under Section 2(d). [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The committee has included an understanding in the resolution of advice and consent that addresses this point (see section V below). [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 10:33 pm by Andrew Russell
Thus, the method is not practiced "within the United States" as required by 35 U.S.C. [read post]