Search for: "United States v. Dakota"
Results 201 - 220
of 1,113
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2020, 5:28 am
United States Army Corps of Engineers: Dakota Access Brief Dakota Access Reply Federal Brief Federal Reply Brief Members of Congress Amicus Brief NIWRC Amicus Brief North Dakota Brief Standing Rock Brief States Against DAPL Amicus Brief States Supporting DAPL Amicus Brief Tribal Orgs Amicus Brief Oral argument audio here. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 7:46 am
For example, 13 states (Arkansas, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Jersey, North Dakota, South Carolina and South Dakota) require authorization—often by voter signature—to collect and drop off ballots on behalf of the voter. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 4:39 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 3:46 am
Remember Buck v. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
This is just the way the “state unit” system works, whatever the Supreme Court had suggested in Gray v. [read post]
10 Oct 2020, 8:00 am
When the Supreme Court entertains argument on Tuesday in United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 10:39 am
The United States awarded Mr. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
South Dakota, she showed that she understood tax law better than anyone else on the Court. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 7:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 2:55 pm
Abouselman (Water Rights)United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 8:20 am
The latest case, Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
Louisiana Legislature Calls Itself Into Second Extraordinary Session and Includes Certain Tax Issues
30 Sep 2020, 8:46 am
As in other states, Louisiana law requires employers to pay into an unemployment insurance fund to cover the cost of state unemployment benefits. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 9:03 pm
” Those agreements with qualified state beef councils, some private and some created by state statutes included Colorado, Florida, Hawaii, Indiana, Kansas, Maryland, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New York, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Virginia and Wisconsin. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 5:43 pm
In that case, the Supreme Court of the United States held that a North Dakota law that criminalized a driver’s refusal to submit to warrantless blood tests incident to arrest was unconstitutional and violated the driver’s Fourth Amendment rights. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 12:00 pm
United States (FTCA)Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pauma & Yuima Reservation v. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 5:17 am
We have received many questions from people wanting to know how the United States Supreme Court decision in Birchfield v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 1:08 pm
He flees to the United States, where he seeks asylum on the ground that he will be tortured if returned to Syria. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 7:11 am
The bulk of the 2017 filings came in two civil cases arising from state courts: South Dakota v. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s ruling in Bostock v. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 3:10 pm
Caballero (Federal Recognition) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2020.htmlIn the Matter of E.J.B. and R.S.B. [read post]
