Search for: "United States v. Daoud"
Results 1 - 20
of 20
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2014, 12:21 pm
Lastly, this Court denies Daoud’s request to suppress all fruits of FISA surveillance without prejudice. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 2:02 pm
In the case of United States v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 1:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
The case, United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 7:02 pm
Barko v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 10:02 am
The district court in Texas entered summary judgment for KBR for both claims on the ground that “all relevant conduct by Daoud and KBR occurred outside of the United States. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 11:03 am
The application for the FISC order was personally approved by John Ashcroft, then the Attorney General of the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 10:28 am
This week, a federal court in Oregon rebuffed him; the following post summarizes the most recent developments in United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 8:00 am
” United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 8:00 am
” United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 9:14 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 8:18 am
Daoud v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 9:20 am
United States V. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 1:16 pm
Also last week, in Daoud Hattav Hassin v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 8:45 am
Although the conduct test was not met, the effects test was.The effects test asked whether conduct outside of the United States had a substantial adverse effect on U.S. investors or securities markets, the court noted. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 6:55 am
And Wells linked to a District Court ruling in United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2014, 7:00 am
He shared Chief Prosecutor Mark Martins’ statement in the 9/11 case United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:34 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 11:12 am
” The United States has finalized a 25-year agreement with Australia that will double the number of American troops training with Australian security forces, according to Defense One. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm
Two witnesses—a former State Department official and Glenn Simpson of Fusion GPS—declined to be interviewed, but there is no suggestion in the report, or in the inspector general’s testimony, that this altered the outcome of the investigation. [read post]
