Search for: "United States v. Donald Johnson"
Results 1 - 20
of 224
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2019, 2:28 pm
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In a complaint filed in United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida against Donald Trump and the Donald Trump Campaign, former campaign staffer Alva Jones... [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:22 pm
” United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:22 pm
” United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:22 pm
” United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 1:00 pm
” When the Supreme Court held in Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 8:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 4:30 am
In order for Section 3 to apply to Donald Trump, he must have been an “officer of the United States” prior to committing the alleged insurrection. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 4:50 pm
Johnson v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 4:34 am
Facts: This case (Johnson v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am
— Donald J. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 4:30 am
— Donald J. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 7:52 am
Donald Johnson Tara J. [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 3:01 am
Doe v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:58 am
If it does not, then Donald Trump may already have commenced a vehicle in which the Supreme Court could complete the job. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 6:59 pm
In the 1871 case of United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 9:00 pm
Johnson 21-896Issue: Whether the U.S. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am
As we contemplate the prospect of another appointment by Donald Trump to the Supreme Court of the United States, the stakes for our nation are extraordinarily high. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 5:56 am
[How Appealing] * And SCOTUS also grants cert to a case raising the scope of what prosecutors must disclose to the defense under Brady v. [read post]