Search for: "United States v. Dow" Results 21 - 40 of 526
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved  Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under… [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am by INFORRM
On 13 December 2023, there was a hearing of an application for strike out in the data protection case of Pacini v Dow Jones before HHJ Parkes KC. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am by INFORRM
United States Reuters reports the US District Court for the District of Montana blocked a ban on TikTok that was set to take effect in Montana 1 Jan. 2024. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 9:43 am
United States, Case No. 1:16-cv-00745-PLF, is pending in the U.S. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 8:07 am by Epstein Becker Green
Jackson Women’s Health Organization one year ago overturned 50 years of legal precedent protecting the constitutional right to abortion in the United States, leaving the question of whether and how to regulate abortion to individual states. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., (1993), on the standards for expert testimony, with 24 departing states, United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am by admin
  To be sure, there are gaps, inconsistencies, and mistakes, but the statistics chapter should be a must-read for federal (and state) judges. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 12:49 pm by Kevin LaCroix
According to the solicitor general of the U.S. in Goldman Sachs Group Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 6:53 pm by Mark Walsh
United States, and the retired justice remains stone-faced with each one. [read post]