Search for: "United States v. Eleven Vehicles" Results 41 - 60 of 87
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2007, 7:31 am
This court upheld Smith's conviction and sentence in 2004, but the Supreme Court vacated his sentence in light of United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 9:49 pm by RegBlog
IN THE NEWS The Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) published the text of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), a proposed trade deal between the United States and eleven other countries intended to “improve regulatory cooperation” through the enforcement of anti-corruption laws and increased public participation in the regulatory process, among other objectives. [read post]
24 May 2022, 4:33 am
  Grand Summit Hotel Condominium Unit Owners’ Ass’n v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 5:00 am by DaytonDUI
 The Ohio jury Instruction cites language from State v. [read post]
8 May 2007, 9:02 am
The Court has asked for the views of the United States in three additional cases - No. 06-923, Metlife v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 10:04 am by Lyle Denniston
United States — justification needed by police officer, after he has pulled over a vehicle for a traffic violation, to go beyond minimally intrusive searching of questioning Armstrong v. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 1:06 pm by Stephen Wm. Smith
” As applied to older technologies, the rule contemplates that a tracking device may be a mechanical tool used to track the movement of a tangible object., like the beeper attached to a container of chloroform in United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 7:08 am by John Elwood
United States, 14-10443, and Lopez v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 4:51 pm by Adam Rosenthal and Robert Foster
”  The suspension of HOS regulations permits drivers to operate a commercial vehicle for longer than eleven hours without needing to take the required ten consecutive hours off duty. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 am
Instead, the proper vehicle forsuch a claim is a 42 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 1:10 pm by Orin Kerr
But courts usually defer to the police in making these sorts of judgements: Judges usually conclude that added questioning didn’t extend the length of the stop too much, and so the stop was still reasonable.Given that usual pattern, I was surprised when I first saw the blurb over at FourthAmendment.com about the Fifth Circuit’s new decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:57 am by John Elwood
United States, 14-29, involving a prosecution under §10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act, or the ’34 Act, as we old-timers call it (rescheduled for this Friday’s Conference); and Crews v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 5:14 pm by Brian
Eleven states currently have a damage cap on personal injury and general tort cases. [read post]