Search for: "United States v. Eleven Vehicles"
Results 41 - 60
of 87
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2014, 6:58 am
When the Ninth Circuit panel in January declared the new standard for sexual orientation claims, it found that such a standard was necessary from a between-the-lines reading of the Supreme Court’s decision last June in United States v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am
United States, 13-127; Brewington v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am
Then, state and federal courts were reluctant to apply tort law even where automobile-accident victims claimed their injuries resulted from the failure of manufacturers to exercise reasonable care in the design of their motor vehicles. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 9:04 pm
United States (12-158) returns to the Court. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 6:35 am
As it relates to the use of the term "motor vehicle" in an insurance policy, the 1985, Fort Worth Court of Appeals case, Western Insurance Companies v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:28 pm
In eleven counts, defendant is accused of illegally having unlicensed, unregistered vehicles on his property on eleven separate dates between 24 April 2003 and 13 August 2005. [read post]
20 May 2013, 9:26 am
Renewable Fuel Standard Program EPA is also responsible for developing and implementing regulations to ensure that transportation fuel sold in the United States contains a minimum volume of renewable fuel. [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:06 am
United States, 12-884, involving state authority in the field of immigration, without comment beyond a one-line notation that “Justice Scalia dissents. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 1:47 pm
United States, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit became the second federal court of appeals to strike down Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) as unconstitutional. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
The Ohio jury Instruction cites language from State v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:57 pm
So, for example, Texas could seek bailout as a covered state …. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 1:41 am
BALLON - #141819 [email] HEATHER MEEKER - #172148 [email] GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP [email] [address] [phone] [fax] Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC. ________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ORACLE AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff, v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:56 pm
The Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of AmericaDocket: 11-1139Issue(s): Whether the First Amendment, as interpreted by this Court in Jones v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:39 am
United States, 11-8737, and Gibbs v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 10:34 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 11:34 am
(Case No. 10-3818) from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit is the latest ruling permitting bulk obtainment of data under the Driver’s Privacy Protection Act (“DPPA”). [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 6:10 am
Va.1997) (same); United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 7:19 am
The Court cited various cases including United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 1:10 pm
But courts usually defer to the police in making these sorts of judgements: Judges usually conclude that added questioning didn’t extend the length of the stop too much, and so the stop was still reasonable.Given that usual pattern, I was surprised when I first saw the blurb over at FourthAmendment.com about the Fifth Circuit’s new decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 12:20 pm
The opinion was issued on June 7, 2011, by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
