Search for: "United States v. Emanuel"
Results 81 - 100
of 152
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2015, 11:26 pm
On Monday, Judge Lucy Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California received a joint ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) statement from Apple and Samsung, which is not publicly accessible. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 12:00 pm
The only judge in the world who has held so far that Apple deserved a patent on that concept is Judge Lucy Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 10:40 am
” In any other year, King v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 8:39 am
S. 558 (2003) and United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 5:41 am
"In mid-2013, the United States Patent and Trademark Office had upheld three claims of that patent, including one Apple asserted against Samsung in the 2012 trial (and the related 2013 retrial).Apple still hasn't given up on its European rubberbanding patent. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 5:15 am
The Northern District of CA dismissed the class action suit in September 2014 on the theory that the case did not have sufficient ties to the United States to overcome the presumption against extraterritoriality under the test set forth by the Supreme Court in Kiobel v. [read post]
U.S. appeals court unlikely to grant Apple an injunction against Samsung over three software patents
4 Mar 2015, 8:00 pm
He expressed great admiration for Apple's contribution to innovation in a 2013 ruling in an Apple v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 2:21 am
Well over a year since the United States Patent and Trademark Office upheld a few claims of Apple's "rubberbanding" (or "overscroll bounceback") U.S. patent, the European version of that patent has come under massive pressure. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 9:45 am
Petitioner filed this action against Respondent and alleged that Respondent wrongfully retained the children in the United States without Petitioner's consent starting on January 7, 2013. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 8:17 am
As the district court found, Ermini and Vittori leased a house in the United States and put their house in Italy on the market; enrolled the children in school and extracurricular activities in the United States; planned to open a business in the United States; prepared to move all of their belongings to the United States; and shifted Daniele's all-important medical care and treatment to the United States.… [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 4:05 am
Ainsworth, Amicus Curiae Brief: Stormans, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 8:49 am
There's an amazing development with respect to the ongoing Apple v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 8:17 pm
The next Apple v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
[a] regulatory body ... of ... the United States"—in this case, the FDA. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 2:43 pm
Late on Wednesday by local (California) time, United States Magistrate Judge Paul S. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 3:20 pm
In Hirst v. [read post]
25 Dec 2013, 1:16 am
If any of the parties declines to proceed before a Magistrate Judge, the case will have to be assigned to a United States District Judge. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:28 am
QE's approach of not teaming up with patent attorneys in these types of proceedings is as unusual as it is controversial in the German IP law community, but in the proceedings I watch there is no indication of them being less effective on their own.All three parties (Apple, Google, Microsoft) also dispatched in-house counsel from the United States, which speaks to the significance of this case.The U.S. equivalent of this patent is still at issue in a Motorola v. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 3:16 am
In the United States the parties want a final FRAND ruling (they disagree only on details), which Google will then appeal. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 11:42 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has already issued one ruling in Apple's favor against Google's Motorola (reversing and remanding an ITC ruling, which Google just asked it to reconsider), was clearly leaning Apple's way last month with respect to its continued pursuit of a permanent injunction against Samsung, and based on how today's appellate hearing on Judge Richard Posner's June 2012 dismissal of a two-way Apple v. [read post]
