Search for: "United States v. Energy Resources Co., Inc" Results 101 - 120 of 194
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2012, 1:33 pm by WIMS
Both BPC Nuclear Initiative Co-Chairmen believe there is an urgent need to break the current stalemate on nuclear waste management in the United States and to develop an effective system to manage the back end of the nuclear fuel cycle. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:22 pm by WIMS
Both BPC Nuclear Initiative Co-Chairmen believe there is an urgent need to break the current stalemate on nuclear waste management in the United States and to develop an effective system to manage the back end of the nuclear fuel cycle. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:25 pm by WIMS
Cir. 2008) and Yankee Atomic Electric Co. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 12:53 pm by admin
  The Commissioner also highlighted some of the Bureau’s initiatives with other major enforcement agencies – for example, the U.K., Australia and the United States – that have proven effective in fighting cross-border deceptive marketing. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 12:42 pm by Steve Szentesi
  The Commissioner also highlighted some of the Bureau’s initiatives with other major enforcement agencies – for example, the U.K., Australia and the United States – that have proven effective in fighting cross-border deceptive marketing. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:49 am by Marie Louise
Atmos Energy (EDTexweblog.com)   US Trademarks Strategies to consider while your trademark application is pending (Seattle Trademark Lawyer)   US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential no. 26: TTAB grants motion to exclude 26 belatedly-identified trial witnesses:  Great Seats, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 4:38 am
Taxpayers also argued that the judgment should be vacated under United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 7:54 am by Don Cruse
Chata, No. 10-0353 Atmos Energy Corporation, Centerpoint Energy Resources Corp. and Texas Gas Service Co., v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 2:39 pm by Lee Smith
Supreme Court issued an opinion on American Electric Power Co., Inc., et al. v. [read post]