Search for: "United States v. Eric Grant" Results 1 - 20 of 606
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2009, 7:04 am
We represent the petitioners in two cases that were granted yesterday, No. 08-645, Abbott v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 1:04 am
Here's a link to my summary of the underlying case.PD-0319-09, Eric Charles Hobbs v. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 10:25 am by Matthew Pomy
The statement is in accordance with Holder's initial statement [text] that the Department of Justice (DOJ) will be extending all federal benefits to same-sex couples legally married according to state law following the decision in United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 9:13 pm
United States, No. 07-1397. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 8:33 pm
I have no idea what it means, but I thought it was interesting.]Eric Sakil v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 7:05 am
United States Supreme Court Protects Aliens' Right to Judicial Review of Motions to Re-open. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 7:19 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Eric Holder managed to destroy any semblance of a reporters privilege in the United States. [read post]
In a brief to the Court, the United States’ case against Halkbank presents two separate legal arguments. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 7:21 am
United States and Weyhrauch v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 11:07 am by Matthew Kahn
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit disagreed, concluding that it was bound by its 2010 decision in United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: This term, the Supreme Court is considering the independent state legislature theory in Moore v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 12:00 am by Ken Monington
Feb. 8, 2018), the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia granted corporate affiliates (“Respondents”) of MediaTechnik Kft. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 10:04 am by Prashant Reddy
Dozens of briefs were filed by amicic curiae, including important briefs by the United States; Dr. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 7:03 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Supreme Court’s landmark decisions regarding same-sex marriage in United States v. [read post]