Search for: "United States v. Erie Railroad Company" Results 1 - 20 of 27
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2023, 2:17 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
The same day it decided Erie Railroad, the Supreme Court recognized in Hinderlider v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:00 am by ernst
Erie Railroad Company v Tompkins in a Private International Law ContextMichael S Green4. [read post]
17 May 2023, 5:26 am by John Coyle
Supreme Court’s decision in Erie Railroad Company v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 7:42 am by Eric Goldman
This was the first statutory recognition of any type of right of privacy in the United States. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm by Hilary Hurd
Humphrey … with intent to subvert the authority of the Government of the United States, to hinder and delay the due execution of the laws of the United States, and to oppress and injure citizens of the United States, did unlawfully act as judge of an illegally constituted tribunal within said State, called the district court of the Confederate States of America, and as judge of said tribunal … then and there… [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 3:57 pm by Mary Whisner
And of course, where would Civil Procedure be without Erie Railroad v. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 11:22 am by Christine Corcos
On July 27, 1934, Harry James Tompkins lost his arm, supposedly when an unsecured refrigerator car door on a train operated by the Erie Railroad Company hit him in the head. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 11:22 am
On July 27, 1934, Harry James Tompkins lost his arm, supposedly when an unsecured refrigerator car door on a train operated by the Erie Railroad Company hit him in the head. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 11:43 am by Anthony Gaughan
” The reason is because the effort to ascertain a universally-applicable, general common law came to an end in the famous 1938 case of Erie Railroad Company v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 11:01 am by Chimène Keitner
The contemporary understanding derives from the Supreme Court’s reasoning in Erie Railroad Co. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 8:56 am by WIMS
Army Corps of Engineers to withdraw the controversial "Waters of the United States" proposal. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:46 am by Joy Waltemath
” Citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Atlantic Marine Construction Co v United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, the appeals court noted that it plainly reaffirmed Bremen’s identification of a strong public policy supporting the enforcement of forum selection clauses. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:40 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
This contribution to a symposium marking the seventy-fifth anniversary of Erie Railroad Company v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm by Bexis
  Under Erie, federal courts are not supposed to invent new liability under their own state’s law; Block is even worse, inventing liability under the unfamiliar law of a different state.Fourth, and finally, adding insult to injury, Block denied all of the defendant’s Daubert motions. [read post]