Search for: "United States v. Fabian"
Results 21 - 40
of 75
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2020, 3:15 am
The United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (‘CISG’) epitomises the UNCITRAL’s endeavour to progressively unify and harmonise commercial law across the boundaries of nation-states. [read post]
12 May 2020, 5:51 am
Instead, it is also about a persistent view of trade unions that predates the platform economy and efforts to avoid unionisation (as the extreme facts in United Steelworkers of America v Baron Metal Industries Inc illustrate). [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 10:01 am
India unlike civil law countries like the United States[2], Germany[3] and France[4] does not codify the definition of force majeure into any legislation. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 9:30 pm
Georgia v. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 5:21 pm
Conversely, Article IX of the Fundamental Law stated: “1. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 8:19 am
Thus, for example, price discounts aimed at recreating the right balance among spectrum fees are not considered State aid. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
Walker, Jr., The Role of Precedents in the United States: How Do Precedents Lose Their Binding Effect? [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 5:00 am
” Gompers v United States, 233 U.S. 604, 610 (1914). [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 4:22 am
Accordingly, the member states should support the right to education, in particular those facing disadvantages, or having special needs. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 9:08 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 4:25 am
The Court of Appeal disagreed, stating that the important consideration was not the sufficient British connection between the employer and employee for the purposes of employment law, but rather the connection between the co-workers. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 7:52 am
New Nippon Steel Corporation Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International LawJean Galbraith, Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law Recent Books on International LawDavid P. [read post]
21 May 2019, 11:57 pm
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) of the United States has won the first round of litigation against Qualcomm. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 11:30 pm
I include those who are unemployed because, in most cases, unemployed people are now commonly assumed to be (paid) ‘job-seekers’ and may have certain social welfare entitlements which provide them with the most basic means for survival.[2] These distinctions may seem sharp and clear-cut as stated here. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm
And, in other news from the FJC, check out the most recent addition to the Center's unit to our Famous Federal Trials series, U.S. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 8:29 am
On Friday morning, President Donald Trump said he would declare a national emergency to allocate more funds to expand walls or barriers at the United States-Mexico border. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 5:44 am
In other words, assume countries A and B have concluded a PTA in accordance with Article V GATS. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 5:44 am
In other words, assume countries A and B have concluded a PTA in accordance with Article V GATS. [read post]
19 Jan 2019, 8:13 am
It's a rather iPhone-centric perspective, but the biggest problem here for Qualcomm is that Judge Koh ruled in GPNE Corp. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 3:30 pm
Cisco Systems, Inc., United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, No. 2017-1525, 09 November 2018 appeared first on Kluwer Patent Blog. [read post]
