Search for: "United States v. Factors & Finance Co"
Results 121 - 140
of 355
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2017, 12:18 pm
At a minimum the party to be bound must be shown to have been aware of the Terms and Conditions at the time of purchase: see Kobelt Manufacturing Co v Pacific Rim Engineered Products (1987) Ltd, 2011 BCSC 224 at para 124, 84 BLR (4th) 189. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 10:47 am
Co. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 6:17 pm
In that prosecution, the United States Patent and Trademark Office had initially refused registration because other financial institutions had already registered loyalt [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 10:19 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 10:45 am
From State v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
In the case of Doherty v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
In the case of Doherty v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am
In Avon State Bank, David Gibson, a man who purported to be the son of a business associate of Ambrose Herdering, a customer of Avon State Bank, sought out the assistance of Herdering in moving the estate of Gibson’s deceased father from the Netherlands to the United States. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 7:12 am
Co. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 2:37 pm
In Case C-228/03 Gillette Co v LA-Laboratories Ltd Oy, the CJEU stated that use that does not create an impression of commercial connection or take unfair advantage of the earlier mark’s distinctive character or repute will be considered honest practice. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 12:32 pm
We saw it in campaign finance with FEC v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 5:54 pm
The result is that for the first time, the United States has what amounts to a data security regulator. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:52 am
July 27, 1989); Georgia Television Co. v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:00 am
A Different Question of Open Access: Is There a Public Access Right to Academic Libraries in the United States and Canada? [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm
The cold streak for rescheduled cases continues, as two of last week’s group were denied without comment: Carpenter Co. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am
Finally, Carpenter Co. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
As stated in Moore’s Federal Practice, “The identity of class members must be ascertainable by reference to objective criteria. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 9:04 am
Co., 469 F.3d 870, 881 (10th Cir. 2006). [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 4:14 am
Supreme Court’s 1974 decision in American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 12:30 am
• Since there was no New Zealand authority on non-literal copyright infringement it was germane to consider English and United States authorities on non-literal software copyright infringement. [read post]
