Search for: "United States v. Fair" Results 41 - 60 of 12,457
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2018, 11:50 am by Seth Barrett Tillman, Josh Blackman
We think its fair import is that any appointee exercising significant authority pursuant to the laws of the United States is an “Officer of the United States,” and must, therefore, be appointed in the manner prescribed by § 2, cl. 2, of that Article. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 4:00 am by Michael Woods and Gordon LaFortune
In 1995, the United States launched the first NAFTA trade challenge.[9] It was the first and only NAFTA Chapter 20 Canada-U.S. dispute as the agreement’s state-to-state provisions fell into disuse. [read post]
26 Dec 2021, 9:15 am by Curtis Dodd
This is Part II of a two-part article discussing FRAND (fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory) licensing developments taking place in the United States in 2021. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 8:38 am by Ryan McCabe
    The United States District Court of Nebraska entered a consent order on March 3, 2010 in United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 8:00 pm by Jason Mazzone
The oral argument this past Wednesday in United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 5:30 pm by Anna Christensen
The United States Sentencing Commission filed an amicus brief in support of the United States. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 10:20 am by Ellis Carter
Girl Scouts of the United States, Inc., the Court held that state fair dealership laws are applicable in the case of the Girl Scouts of the United State’s dealings with its chapters. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:47 am by DMLP Staff
§ 875(c); conspiracy to make publically available restricted personal information of an employee of the United States under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:47 am by DMLP Staff
§ 875(c); conspiracy to make publically available restricted personal information of an employee of the United States under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 2:18 pm by Zachary Spilman
On Monday CAAF will hear oral argument in the case of United States v. [read post]