Search for: "United States v. Feld" Results 41 - 57 of 57
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2009, 5:38 am
(International Law Office)   United States US Patents – Decisions BPAI: Merely outputting from a computer suffices under Bilski: Ex parte Dickerson (12:01 Tuesday)   US Copyright How many people have been sued in recording industry’s legal war on file-sharing? [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 2:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In A&E TELEVISION NETWORKS, LLC, , -v.- PIVOT POINT ENTERTAINMENT, LLC,; 10 Civ. 9422 (PGG) (JLC);UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK;2011 U.S. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm by Duncan
Urge your MEP to take a stand for internet freedom (Electronic Frontier Foundation) Finland Finnish BitTorrent admins receive 680,000 Euro fine (TorrentFreak) Netherlands Rival ISPs team up in Court to fight Pirate Bay Block (TorrentFreak) Sweden ‘No evidence’ anti-piracy group hacked FTP server (TorrentFreak) Swedish ISP blocks The Pirate Bay following injunction (TorrentFreak) United States US General Steps to ‘Internet-proof’ your cease and… [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 5:12 am
Urge your MEP to take a stand for internet freedom (Electronic Frontier Foundation)   Finland Finnish BitTorrent admins receive 680,000 Euro fine (TorrentFreak)   Netherlands Rival ISPs team up in Court to fight Pirate Bay Block (TorrentFreak)   Sweden ‘No evidence’ anti-piracy group hacked FTP server (TorrentFreak) Swedish ISP blocks The Pirate Bay following injunction (TorrentFreak)   United States US General Steps to ‘Internet-proof’… [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:12 am by @ErikJHeels
It Don't Mean A Thing If It Ain't Got That Swing On 06/28/10, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Bilski v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 1:24 am
Kaplan on Monday prevented attorneys Robert Fink and Caroline Rule from withdrawing as defense counsel to former KPMG partner Richard Smith in United States v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:33 am by Jeffrey Mitchell
Congress has reportedly authorized $550 million in the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) ReConnect funding in 2019 (as compared to $600 million in 2018). [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 7:18 am by Podhurst Orseck
The high court in in 2012 dismissed as “improvidently granted review” First American v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 8:13 am
Supreme Court rulings, including this month's Quanta Computer Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 1:18 am
So, during oral arguments at the Supreme Court on Monday in Astrue v. [read post]