Search for: "United States v. Feldman"
Results 21 - 40
of 408
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2012, 1:07 am
FELDMAN and FELDMAN LAW GROUP, Defendants.11 Civ. 1396 (CM) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK; 2011 U.S. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:16 am
Appellant was returned to the United States in custody and, although previously had been voluntarily in the United States, he was not "found in" the US at that point. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 5:24 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 9:36 am
United States on Monday, April 18, despite the case being “orphaned” by the U.S. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 7:39 am
I very much enjoy debunking those myths: United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 6:35 am
While in Germany, Gabriela "said to the Competent Agency for Youth Services that she 'was not willing to return w[i]th the child to the United States.' " In an effort to bring about the return of his son to the United States, Keith filed Hague Convention proceedings in Germany through the United States Department of State. [read post]
16 May 2007, 6:18 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 12:08 am
United States, 2007 U.S. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 8:44 pm
United States, 323 U. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 4:02 am
The Rooker-Feldman doctrine provides that no federal courts, other than the United States Supreme Court, have the authority to review final judgments of state courts. [read post]
30 Apr 2022, 10:58 am
" This investigation is governed by regulations promulgated by the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 2:25 am
Thomas, on the issue of unconstitutionally excessive statutory damages, a petition for certiorari has been filed with the United States Supreme Court.The petition maintains that a statutory damages award which is 44 times the actual damages is unconstitutional. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 10:11 am
Similarly, in Marvin Feldman v Mexico, the United States submitted a view that benefitted the claimant’s claim that under NAFTA 1117(1), the NAFTA did not bar a claim against Mexico under Chapter 11 by a natural person who was both a citizen of the United States and a permanent resident of Mexico (Marvin Roy Feldman v United Mexican States, Submission of the United States of America on… [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 8:37 am
United States, decided June 23, 2016 (75 lower court citations)... 4) Ross v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:43 am
United States, in which it is considering whether a conspiracy to commit extortion requires the conspirators to agree to obtain property from someone outside the conspiracy, and the arbitration case DIRECTV v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 1:00 pm
On June 23, 2014, the United States Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated decision in Halliburton Co. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 7:30 am
Contents include:Case CommentsHans van Houtte & Bridie McAsey, Abaclat and others v Argentine Republic: ICSID, the BIT and Mass Claims Andrea Marco Steingruber, Abaclat and Others v Argentine Republic: Consent in Large-scale Arbitration Proceedings Céline Lévesque, Abaclat and Others v Argentine Republic: The Definition of Investment Samuel Wordsworth, Abaclat and Others v Argentine Republic: Jurisdiction, Admissibility and Pre-conditions to… [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 4:42 am
United States. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 11:02 am
On May 28, 2019, United States District Judge Martin Feldman issued a sixty-four page Order and Reasons which granted motions to remand filed by Plaquemines Parish and the State of Louisiana in The Parish of Plaquemines v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 11:02 am
On May 28, 2019, United States District Judge Martin Feldman issued a sixty-four page Order and Reasons which granted motions to remand filed by Plaquemines Parish and the State of Louisiana in The Parish of Plaquemines v. [read post]
