Search for: "United States v. Flood"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,120
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2019, 10:18 am
Case citation: State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:46 am
Reactions to the Supreme Court's hugely anticipated Citizens United case are flooding in. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 9:22 am
United States (Fed. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:23 am
CV058444 DDP (PLAx), venued in the United States District Court Central District of California. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 2:40 pm
In Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 7:51 pm
United States (2012), the Supreme Court rejected the Obama administration's dubious argument that temporary flooding of property by the government can never qualify as a taking. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 4:39 am
United States (D. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 1:54 am
You remember the Branch Consultants v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 9:51 am
In the history of the United States, more than 11,000 amendments to the Constitution have been proposed, and only 27 have passed. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:58 pm
United States, which seeks review of an interesting takings case out of the U.S. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 10:50 am
The United States Supreme Court ruled today in Caperton v. [read post]
11 Nov 2017, 10:15 am
" A trial date for Oliver, who has been charged with murder, has been set for January 22.Hurricane Harvey and flooding at TDCJDid the Texas Department of Criminal Justice mislead the public about flooding at Beaumont-area state-run prisons? [read post]
6 Oct 2006, 12:49 pm
What Hernandez actually says is: "[T]he United States Supreme Court has held that denial of this constitutional right is 'subject to a harmless error analysis unless the deprivation, by its very nature, cannot be harmless.' Rushen v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:43 am
Flood’s ill-fated challenge to the infamous reserve clause landed him before the United States Supreme Court in 1972. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 6:35 pm
The case, Knick v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:09 pm
This flood of out-of-state money was made possible, they argue, by the Citizens United decision, which struck down certain limits on corporate electioneering. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:26 am
Facts The respondent, Gary Flood, was a Detective Sergeant with the Metropolitan Police Service’s Extradition Unit. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
The documentary, which premiered last night, chronicles Curt Flood's historic legal challenge to baseball's reserve clause and antitrust exemption, culminating in the United States Supreme Court's 1972 decision of Flood v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 10:50 am
The United States Supreme Court ruled today in Caperton v. [read post]
