Search for: "United States v. Foley" Results 121 - 140 of 263
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm by Bexis
Bazarsky, The Future of PennsylvaniaProducts Liability as Applied by Federal and State Courts: Covell v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
An investor who accumulates sufficient ETF Shares to comprise a Creation Unit may have the Creation Unit redeemed by the ETF under limited circumstances. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 1:25 pm by William Appleton
United States of America, which vacated a U.S. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 2:57 pm by William Appleton
United States which held that the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program conflicted with limits on executive authority in the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 1:33 pm by Josh Blackman
House Resolution 676 was framed very broadly: The lawsuit could “seek any appropriate relief regarding the failure” of all executive-branch officials — including the president himself — “to act in a manner consistent with that official’s duties under the Constitution and laws of the United States with respect to implementation” of the ACA. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Cummins is a partner and civil litigator with the Scranton law firm of Foley Comerford & Cummins. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Corp. v Kassis, 182 AD2d 22, 27 [1st Dept 1992] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted], lv dismissed and denied 80 NY2d 1005 [1992]; see Foley v Roche, 68 AD2d 558, 567-568 [1st Dept 1979]). [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Corp. v Kassis, 182 AD2d 22, 27 [1st Dept 1992] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted], lv dismissed and denied 80 NY2d 1005 [1992]; see Foley v Roche, 68 AD2d 558, 567-568 [1st Dept 1979]). [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 6:30 am by Jane Chong
Most famously, all fifty states make 21 the legal drinking age because in the most important pre-Sebelius conditional funding case, South Dakota v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL.At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 17th day of July, two thousand eighteen.PRESENT: DENNIS JACOBS,REENA RAGGI,PETER W. [read post]