Search for: "United States v. Fredericks"
Results 1 - 20
of 438
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2018, 9:56 am
Cir. 2013) and, thanks to a hung jury in the first trial, in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 3:30 am
Sandford, the United States Supreme Court reached the opposite conclusion. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 12:15 pm
While not explicitly stated – because this is a work of legal history – this Article obviously has implications for modern issues surrounding marriage equality, child-custody based on interstate recognitions of status changes, the interstate recognition of gender transitions, and the legal rights of non-citizens within the United States. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 12:15 pm
While not explicitly stated – because this is a work of legal history – this Article obviously has implications for modern issues surrounding marriage equality, child-custody based on interstate recognitions of status changes, the interstate recognition of gender transitions, and the legal rights of non-citizens within the United States. [read post]
15 May 2018, 11:04 am
While not explicitly stated – because this is a work of legal history – this Article obviously has implications for modern issues surrounding marriage equality, child-custody based on interstate recognitions of status changes, the interstate recognition of gender transitions, and the legal rights of non-citizens within the United States.Download the article here. [read post]
15 May 2018, 11:04 am
While not explicitly stated – because this is a work of legal history – this Article obviously has implications for modern issues surrounding marriage equality, child-custody based on interstate recognitions of status changes, the interstate recognition of gender transitions, and the legal rights of non-citizens within the United States.Download the article here. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 6:09 am
(SCOTUSwiki) At 11 a.m., the Court is scheduled to hear argument in United States v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 11:21 am
New Mexico and Colorado, and Frederick Yarger also argued in Texas v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 4:45 am
United States, the Rule 41(g) case I mentioned last week. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:18 am
Like he would be in the later Plessy v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 12:36 pm
This morning I attended oral argument at the United States Supreme Court in the maritime case of Dutra Group v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 10:14 pm
I also draw important lessons from the Justices' differing views and suggest what they portend more generally for the likely direction of the current United States Supreme Court. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 8:10 am
Here is the opinion in United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2006, 6:40 pm
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in a case involving free speech rights of high school students. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 2:48 am
[1] R (Barclay) v Secretary of State for Justice & Ors [2009] UKSC 9 [2] R (Barclay & Anor) v Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor, The Committee for the Affairs of Jersey and Guernsey and Her Ma [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:18 am
Like he would be in the later Plessy v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 6:57 pm
Here are today’s docket entries: ORDER by Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court directing the designation and assignment of a United States District Judge for service in another circuit; assigning Judge Frederick J. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 7:17 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 4:05 pm
Circuit, United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 7:50 am
Thereafter, plaintiffs filed their amended complaint with the class action allegations in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. [read post]
